Nuitka, Python research and Physics

Once upon a time ago physics had multiple forces. Each with very distinct traits. These were the early days. Then as time went on people started to realize that weak nuclear force and electromagnetic force were the same sort. That was after discovering that electricity and magnetism were the same, and that is the pattern. It's called symmetry, equivalence, and so on.

The Nuitka project is effectively a Python research that goes through the same steps. There are e.g. currently local variables, closure variables (shared from containing function), module variables, temp holder, temp keeper, and temp variables.

Often when I added one more this was driven by code generation needs or deficiencies at the time. These are of course way too many, and all are good at one thing only.

So the main task Nuitka is faced with now to e.g. generalize that "temp keeper" variables are temporary variables local to one statement only, surely to be released afterwards, and make that particular feature e.g. work for all variables across the board. Right now, code generation uses "cheats" where it puts a C++ block and local declarations for "temp keeper" variables.

It would be good, if it could be a try with del statement on the "temp keeper variable" in its finally part and yet, get the same code generated. Difficult, yes, but not impossible, and definitely what I am aiming at.

So that is what Nuitka will be dealing with in the next releases. Once done, maybe there will be a "gravity", i.e. the one thing not yet harmonized, but for good reasons. Potentially limited due to lack of understanding, potentially because there is a good reason. And so not all we be unified or maybe e.g. module variables will be a bit more special than local variables, although modules are just functions with variables writable everywhere.

Good stuff is coming, hold on. Join the project, or support it financially if you wish.

Nuitka still is too much of a one man show. Should I be asked to name one single weakness of it - that would be it.

Comments

Comments powered by Disqus